Best Free EHR Software in 2026
The complete guide to free Electronic Health Record systems. We analyze 8+ options, reveal hidden costs, and help you decide if βfreeβ is really the best choice for your practice.
Spoiler: βFreeβ EHR software typically costs $100-500/month when you add up hosting, IT support, and premium features. Sometimes affordable paid options provide better value.

Quick Summary: Free EHR Reality Check
Table of Contents
Complete Free EHR System Reviews
Honest analysis of every free and open-source EHR option available in 2026, including their true costs and limitations.
OpenEMR
Open Source100,000+ installations
Best for: Tech-savvy practices, community health centers
Features
- βFull EHR/EMR functionality
- βPractice management
- βE-prescribing (paid add-on)
- βPatient portal
- βBilling and claims
- βMulti-language support
- βHIPAA compliant
- βICD-10/CPT coding
Limitations
- βRequires technical setup
- βSelf-hosted = IT overhead
- βLimited support without subscription
- βSteeper learning curve
- βUpdates require manual installation
Practice Fusion
Cloud-Based (Ad-Supported)30,000+ providers
Best for: Small practices wanting cloud EHR
Features
- βCloud-based access
- βE-prescribing
- βLab integration
- βCharting templates
- βPatient portal
- βMobile app
- βAppointment scheduling
- βBasic reporting
Limitations
- βAdvertisements in interface
- βLimited customization
- βData portability concerns
- βAcquired by Veradigm (support changes)
- βFeature restrictions on free tier
Cliniko
Allied Health Focus65,000+ practitioners
Best for: Physical therapy, chiropractic, allied health
Features
- βOnline booking
- βTelehealth included
- βPatient communications
- βTreatment notes
- βInvoicing & payments
- βPractitioner app
- βNo long-term contracts
- βHIPAA compliant
Limitations
- βNot truly free (trial only)
- βLimited for primary care
- βNo e-prescribing
- βBasic lab integration
- βAustralia-based (timezone support)
FreeMED
Open SourceLimited active community
Best for: Developers, custom implementations
Features
- βModular architecture
- βMulti-practice support
- βBasic scheduling
- βDocumentation templates
- βBilling module
- βCustomizable
- βPHP-based (easy modification)
- βDatabase flexibility
Limitations
- βOutdated interface
- βMinimal active development
- βLimited documentation
- βNo mobile app
- βCommunity support only
GNUHealth
Open Source Hospital SystemUsed in 40+ countries
Best for: Public health, hospitals, developing regions
Features
- βHospital information system
- βLab management
- βImaging integration
- βPharmacy management
- βSocial determinants tracking
- βEpidemiology tools
- βWHO ICD-10 native
- βMulti-facility support
Limitations
- βComplex implementation
- βOverkill for small practices
- βRequires Linux expertise
- βEnterprise-focused features
- βTraining investment needed
Solismed
Cloud EHR5,000+ users
Best for: Solo practitioners, startups
Features
- βCloud-based
- βAppointment scheduling
- βBasic charting
- βPatient records
- βTask management
- βSimple interface
- βNo installation required
- βMobile responsive
Limitations
- βLimited free features
- βNo e-prescribing
- βBasic reporting only
- βLimited integrations
- βSmaller vendor (stability concerns)
ChARM Health
Cloud EHR + RCM20,000+ providers
Best for: Very small practices, telehealth focus
Features
- βIntegrated telehealth
- βPatient portal
- βE-prescribing
- βAppointment reminders
- βBasic billing
- βMobile app
- βCustomizable templates
- βHIPAA compliant
Limitations
- β50 encounter limit on free
- βPer-encounter pricing can add up
- βComplex pricing tiers
- βSupport response times vary
- βLearning curve for setup
LibreHealth EHR
Open SourceGrowing community
Best for: Community health, OpenEMR alternative
Features
- βFork of OpenEMR
- βModernized interface
- βPatient portal
- βScheduling
- βDocumentation
- βBilling support
- βActive development
- βCommunity governance
Limitations
- βSmaller community than OpenEMR
- βFewer third-party integrations
- βSelf-hosted complexity
- βDocumentation gaps
- βFewer turnkey hosting options
Feature Comparison Matrix
Side-by-side comparison of critical features across the top free EHR options.
| Category | OpenEMR | Practice Fusion | ChARM Health | GNUHealth | LibreHealth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup & Deployment | Self-hosted (complex) | Cloud (instant) | Cloud (quick) | Self-hosted (very complex) | Self-hosted (moderate) |
| E-Prescribing | Paid add-on ($50+/mo) | Included (with limits) | Included in paid tiers | Pharmacy module | Limited |
| Patient Portal | Included | Included | Included | MyGNUHealth app | Basic |
| Mobile Access | Responsive web | Native app | Native app | MyGNUHealth app | Responsive web |
| Support Quality | Community + paid | Standard support | Good (varies by tier) | Community only | Community only |
Score: 1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent β’ Based on 2026 product evaluations
Free vs. Paid EHR: The Complete Analysis
A detailed comparison to help you make the right decision for your practice.
| Factor | Free EHR | Paid EHR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Monthly Cost | $100-500/month (hidden) | $100-400/month (transparent) | PaidPredictable budgeting, no surprise costs |
| Implementation Time | 2-8 weeks (DIY) | 1-2 weeks (vendor-led) | PaidFaster time to productivity |
| Feature Completeness | Often limited | Full suite included | PaidE-prescribing, labs, billing all included |
| Support & Training | Community/forums | Dedicated support team | PaidGuaranteed response times |
| Customization | Unlimited (with dev skills) | Limited to vendor options | FreeOpen source = full control |
| HIPAA Compliance | Your responsibility | Vendor's responsibility | PaidBAA included, compliance maintained |
| Long-term Viability | Community dependent | Vendor dependent | TieBoth have sustainability risks |
| AI & Modern Features | Rarely available | Increasingly common | PaidAI scribes, voice recognition trending |
Verdict: Paid EHRs win 5-1 for most practices. Free options only make sense for tech-savvy practitioners who value customization over support.
Recommendations by Practice Type
Our expert recommendations based on practice size, specialty, and technical capabilities.
Solo Practice (<500 patients)
ChARM Health Free Tier or Affordable Paid EHR
Free tier covers low volume, but consider paid EHR + AI scribe combo for better efficiency. The hidden costs of "free" often exceed affordable paid options like PatientNotes ($50/month for AI documentation).
Small Group (2-5 providers)
Paid Cloud EHR (Skip free options)
Multi-user free tiers rarely exist. Self-hosted open source requires IT staff you likely don't have. Investment in proper EHR + AI documentation tools pays dividends in efficiency.
Community Health Center
OpenEMR with Professional Support
Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) often qualify for grants covering EHR implementation. OpenEMR's multi-language support and community health features are unmatched in free options.
Tech-Savvy Solo Doc
OpenEMR Self-Hosted
If you enjoy tinkering with technology and can handle basic server administration, OpenEMR offers the most features for truly $0 software cost. Budget $50-100/month for hosting.
Telehealth-Focused Practice
ChARM Health or Paid Telehealth Platform
Built-in telehealth is critical. Free options often lack quality video integration. Invest in proper telehealth EHR - patient experience directly impacts retention.
International/Developing Region
GNUHealth
Designed for resource-limited settings with WHO standards built-in. Strong community in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. Hospital-grade features at zero software cost.
The Smart Alternative: Budget EHR + AI Documentation
Instead of fighting with free EHR limitations, many practices now use affordable EHRs combined with AI documentation tools for the best value.
Better than βfreeβ EHR hidden costs + your time savings value
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about free EHR software.
Is truly free EHR software really free?
No EHR is completely free. "Free" software has hidden costs: hosting ($50-200/month for self-hosted), IT support, training time, and often premium features require payment. Ad-supported "free" EHRs trade your attention (and sometimes data) for access. Budget $100-500/month for a realistic "free" EHR implementation.
Is OpenEMR HIPAA compliant?
OpenEMR CAN be HIPAA compliant, but compliance is YOUR responsibility. You must: host on HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, configure security settings properly, maintain audit logs, encrypt data at rest and in transit, and execute BAAs with hosting providers. Many practices fail to properly secure self-hosted systems.
Why did Practice Fusion become ad-supported?
Practice Fusion was originally fully free, supported by pharmaceutical advertising in the EHR interface. Following FDA warnings and a $145 million DOJ settlement in 2020 for accepting kickbacks, the company changed ownership (now Veradigm) and modified its business model. Free tiers now have significant limitations.
Can free EHR software handle e-prescribing?
Basic e-prescribing is available in some free options, but EPCS (Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances) almost always requires paid add-ons ($30-100/month) due to DEA identity verification requirements and Surescripts network fees. This is a critical hidden cost for many practices.
What happens to my data if a free EHR shuts down?
This is a significant risk. Open source options (OpenEMR, LibreHealth) store data on your servers - you control it. Cloud-based free EHRs may have complex data export processes or charge fees. Always negotiate data portability terms and maintain regular backups regardless of EHR choice.
Should I use free EHR software for my new practice?
For most new practices, we recommend affordable paid EHRs ($100-300/month) over "free" options. Your time has value - the hours spent on IT issues, workarounds, and feature limitations often exceed the cost of a proper system. Consider combining a budget EHR with AI documentation tools like PatientNotes ($50/month) for the best value.
How do free EHRs compare to AI medical scribes?
They solve different problems. EHRs are record-keeping systems; AI scribes automate documentation creation. Many practices now use affordable EHRs combined with AI scribes (like PatientNotes at $50/month) to minimize both software and documentation time costs. This combination often provides better ROI than a premium all-in-one EHR.
Are there free EHR options certified for MIPS/MACRA?
OpenEMR maintains ONC certification for MIPS reporting. However, properly configuring quality measures and generating reports requires significant expertise. Most practices pursuing MIPS incentives find certified paid EHRs with built-in quality dashboards provide better ROI through higher reimbursements.
Related Resources
Skip the Hidden Costs - Start with PatientNotes
At $50/month with a 7-day free trial, PatientNotes costs less than the hidden expenses of most βfreeβ EHR implementations. Automated AI documentation for any EHR system.
Start Free Trial - No Credit Card Required