Back to Resources
PT Documentation Guide35 min read

Physical Therapy SOAP Notes: Complete Documentation Guide

Master PT documentation with this comprehensive guide to SOAP notes. Learn proper format with ROM measurements, strength testing, functional outcomes, and Medicare requirements. Includes complete examples of initial evaluations, progress notes, and discharge summaries.

Physical Therapy Documentation

Updated January 2025
Written by PT Documentation Experts
27%
of PT time spent documenting
SOAP
standard format for PT notes
90 days
Medicare recertification period
FOTO
required by many payers

Why Physical Therapy Documentation Matters

Physical therapy documentation serves as the foundation for patient care, legal protection, and reimbursement. According to APTA, physical therapists spend approximately 27% of their work time on documentation, making it a critical professional skill that directly impacts practice sustainability and patient outcomes.

🏥

Medical Necessity

Justifies skilled PT services and differentiates from maintenance or wellness programs

⚖️

Legal Protection

Provides defensible record of evaluation, treatment, and clinical decision-making

💰

Reimbursement

Demonstrates skilled services for insurance payment and Medicare compliance

💬

Communication

Shares findings and progress with physicians, patients, and interdisciplinary team

📊

Outcomes Tracking

Measures progress with standardized tools and functional outcome measures

Quality Assurance

Supports evidence-based practice and quality reporting programs like FOTO

APTA Documentation Standards

The American Physical Therapy Association requires documentation to be: timely (completed within facility timeframes), accurate (objective and measurable), comprehensive (all relevant findings), and legible (EHR or clearly written). Documentation must support medical necessity and skilled service provision.

SOAP Format for Physical Therapy

The SOAP note format provides a structured approach to PT documentation that meets regulatory requirements while capturing comprehensive patient information.

S

Subjective

Patient-Reported Information

Document the patient's perspective including chief complaint, pain levels, functional limitations, and goals

Key Elements to Document:

Chief complaint and mechanism of injury
Pain location, quality, intensity (0-10 scale), and behavior
Aggravating and alleviating factors
Current functional limitations
Patient goals for therapy
Medical history relevant to current condition
Medication use and responses
Previous treatments and outcomes

Pro Tip:

Use direct quotes when possible. Document pain with the OPQRST method: Onset, Provocation, Quality, Region/Radiation, Severity, Timing.

O

Objective

Measurable Clinical Findings

Quantifiable data from your examination including ROM, strength, special tests, gait analysis, and functional assessments

Key Elements to Document:

Observation (posture, gait pattern, assistive devices)
Palpation findings (tenderness, swelling, temperature)
Range of Motion (goniometric measurements)
Muscle strength (MMT grades 0-5)
Special tests (sensitivity/specificity)
Neurological screening (dermatomes, myotomes, reflexes)
Functional tests and outcome measures
Treatment interventions performed

Pro Tip:

Always include numerical measurements. Document bilateral comparisons. Use standardized outcome measures (FOTO, LEFS, DASH, etc.).

A

Assessment

Clinical Interpretation

Your professional analysis synthesizing subjective and objective data into a clinical picture and prognosis

Key Elements to Document:

PT diagnosis using ICF framework
Impairments identified (body structure/function)
Activity limitations
Participation restrictions
Progress toward goals (with percentages)
Response to treatment
Prognosis and rehabilitation potential
Complications or precautions

Pro Tip:

Connect findings to functional limitations. Justify skilled services. Update prognosis based on progress. Reference standardized measures.

P

Plan

Treatment Strategy

Detailed plan for ongoing treatment including frequency, duration, interventions, and progression strategies

Key Elements to Document:

Frequency and duration (e.g., 3x/week for 4 weeks)
Specific interventions planned
Exercise prescription (sets, reps, intensity)
Patient education topics
Home exercise program
Short-term and long-term goals (SMART format)
Progression criteria
Discharge planning considerations

Pro Tip:

Be specific with exercise prescriptions. Document medical necessity for continued skilled services. Update plan based on response.

Complete PT SOAP Note Examples

These comprehensive examples demonstrate proper documentation for different note types with realistic measurements, clinical reasoning, and Medicare-compliant language.

Initial Evaluation

Outpatient Orthopedics - Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

initial_evaluation.txt
PHYSICAL THERAPY INITIAL EVALUATION

Date: 01/15/2025                    Time: 10:00 AM
Patient: John Smith                 DOB: 03/22/1978 (46 yo)
Diagnosis: Right shoulder impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tendinopathy
Physician: Dr. Sarah Johnson, MD    Script Date: 01/10/2025

SUBJECTIVE
----------
Chief Complaint: "I have constant pain in my right shoulder that's affecting my work and sleep."

History of Present Illness: Patient is a 46-year-old male carpenter who reports gradual onset of right shoulder pain over the past 3 months. Denies specific traumatic event. Patient describes pain as "deep aching" that becomes "sharp and stabbing" with overhead activities. Pain rated 3/10 at rest, 7-8/10 with overhead reaching. Reports significant difficulty with work tasks requiring overhead activity (painting, installing cabinets). Sleep disrupted 4-5 nights per week due to pain when rolling onto right shoulder.

Pain Pattern:
- Location: Anterolateral shoulder, radiates to deltoid insertion
- Quality: Deep ache at rest, sharp with movement
- Intensity: 3/10 at rest, 7-8/10 with activity
- Aggravating: Overhead reaching, lifting >10 lbs, lying on right side
- Alleviating: Ice, rest, NSAIDs (moderate relief)
- 24-hr pattern: Worse in evening after work, morning stiffness ~30 min

Functional Limitations:
- Unable to reach overhead for work tasks (0% tolerance)
- Difficulty with self-care: washing hair, reaching to back pocket
- Cannot lift tools overhead (previously lifted up to 40 lbs)
- Avoids recreational softball due to pain

Prior Treatment: Self-treated with ice and ibuprofen 400mg TID with partial relief. No prior PT.

Medical History: No previous shoulder injuries. Hypertension controlled with lisinopril. Non-smoker.

Patient Goals:
1. Return to work without restrictions (full duty carpenter)
2. Sleep through the night without shoulder pain
3. Return to recreational softball

OBJECTIVE
---------
Observation:
- Posture: Forward head posture, rounded shoulders bilaterally, right shoulder held in slight internal rotation
- Gait: Normal pattern, arms swing symmetrically
- Assistive devices: None required

Palpation:
- Point tenderness over anterior shoulder at bicipital groove (4/10 pain)
- Tenderness over subacromial space (5/10 pain)
- Mild warmth, no visible swelling
- Upper trapezius hypertonicity bilaterally, worse on right

Range of Motion (goniometric measurements):
                    Right          Left          WNL
Flexion             142°           175°          180°
Abduction           135° (pain)    178°          180°
External Rotation   52°            88°           90°
Internal Rotation   T12 level      T8 level      T8
Horizontal Add      85°            125°          130°

Pain with active ROM at end-range flexion and abduction (6/10).
Painful arc present 70-120° abduction.

Manual Muscle Testing (0-5 scale):
                    Right          Left
Flexion             4/5            5/5
Abduction           4-/5 (pain)    5/5
External Rotation   3+/5           5/5
Internal Rotation   4/5            5/5
Scapular muscles:
- Serratus anterior: 3+/5 (winging noted with wall push-up)
- Middle/Lower trap: 3/5 bilaterally
- Rhomboids: 3+/5

Special Tests:
- Neer's impingement: Positive (+) right shoulder
- Hawkins-Kennedy: Positive (+) right shoulder
- Empty can (Jobe's): Positive (+) for pain and weakness right shoulder
- Drop arm test: Negative (-)
- Lift-off test: Unable to perform due to pain/weakness

Neurological Screening:
- Dermatomes C5-T1: Intact bilaterally
- Myotomes C5-T1: Weakness noted as above in shoulder, otherwise intact
- Reflexes (biceps, triceps): 2+ bilaterally, symmetrical
- Upper limb tension test: Negative

Functional Assessment:
- Reaching to overhead shelf: Requires compensation with trunk side-bending, pain 7/10
- Simulated hammering overhead: Unable to perform >5 repetitions due to pain
- Modified DASH: 42/100 (higher score = greater disability)
- PENN Shoulder Score: 54/100 (lower score = greater disability)

Treatment Provided Today:
- Joint mobilization: Grade III posterior glide, improved ER ROM by 8°
- Soft tissue mobilization to upper trapezius, anterior shoulder
- Therapeutic exercise: Scapular stabilization exercises (rows, Ws, Ys)
- Modalities: Ice 15 minutes post-treatment
- Patient education: Activity modification, posture correction

Patient Response: Tolerated initial treatment well. Reports pain decreased from 4/10 to 2/10 post-treatment. Demonstrated good understanding of HEP.

ASSESSMENT
----------
Physical Therapy Diagnosis: Right shoulder impingement syndrome with rotator cuff tendinopathy and scapular dyskinesis.

Impairments (Body Structure/Function):
- ROM deficits: Flexion (-38°), abduction (-45°), ER (-38°) right shoulder
- Strength deficits: External rotators (3+/5), scapular stabilizers (3-3+/5)
- Pain with overhead activities (7-8/10)
- Postural dysfunction: Forward head, rounded shoulders
- Scapular dyskinesis: Poor neuromuscular control, winging present

Activity Limitations:
- Unable to perform overhead work tasks (carpentry) 0/100%
- Difficulty with ADLs: dressing, grooming requiring shoulder elevation
- Modified DASH 42/100 indicates moderate functional limitation

Participation Restrictions:
- Unable to work full duty (currently on light duty restrictions)
- Cannot participate in recreational softball
- Sleep disruption 4-5 nights/week affecting quality of life

Response to Treatment: Positive initial response to manual therapy with immediate ROM improvement. Patient demonstrated good body awareness and exercise technique.

Prognosis: Good to excellent. Patient is motivated, generally healthy, and demonstrates good movement patterns with cueing. Expected to return to full work duties and recreational activities.

Rehabilitation Potential: Excellent for return to prior level of function with skilled PT intervention including manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, and activity-specific training.

PLAN
----
Frequency/Duration: 2x/week for 6 weeks, then reassess (12 visits)

Treatment Interventions:
1. Manual Therapy:
   - Joint mobilization: Posterior/inferior glenohumeral glides (Grade III-IV)
   - Soft tissue mobilization: Upper trapezius, pectoralis minor, anterior shoulder

2. Therapeutic Exercise:
   - Scapular stabilization progression (isometric → dynamic)
   - Rotator cuff strengthening (progressive resistance)
   - Postural training and thoracic mobility
   - Progressive overhead strengthening program

3. Neuromuscular Re-education:
   - Scapulohumeral rhythm training
   - Movement pattern correction for work tasks

4. Modalities: Ice PRN for pain management

5. Patient Education:
   - Activity modification strategies for work
   - Ergonomic positioning
   - Sleep positioning to minimize pain

Home Exercise Program (HEP):
- Pendulum exercises 2x/day for pain relief
- Scapular retraction (rows with resistance band) 2x15, daily
- External rotation strengthening (sidelying) 2x15, daily
- Wall slides for shoulder elevation 2x10, daily
- Postural exercises (chin tucks, scapular setting) throughout day
- Ice 15 min after HEP or aggravating activities

Short-Term Goals (3 weeks):
1. Decrease pain to 2/10 at rest, 4/10 with activity
2. Increase shoulder flexion ROM to 165°
3. Increase ER strength to 4/5
4. Improve scapular stabilizer strength to 4/5
5. Demonstrate independent HEP with proper form

Long-Term Goals (6 weeks):
1. Pain 0-1/10 with all activities including overhead work
2. Restore full shoulder ROM bilaterally symmetrical
3. Restore 5/5 strength all shoulder and scapular muscles
4. Return to full duty work without restrictions
5. Modified DASH score <15 (minimal disability)
6. Independent with advanced exercise program for long-term maintenance

Plan for Progression:
- Week 1-2: Focus on pain reduction, ROM, basic strengthening
- Week 3-4: Progress resistance, introduce functional movements
- Week 5-6: Work-specific training, sport-specific activities, discharge planning

Next Visit: 01/17/2025 - Progress ROM and strengthening, reassess pain and functional abilities

Medical Necessity: Skilled PT services required for manual therapy techniques, exercise prescription/progression, neuromuscular re-education, and work-specific training that cannot be self-taught.

___________________________
Physical Therapist Signature
Lic #: PT123456
Date: 01/15/2025

Progress Note

Outpatient Orthopedics - ACL Reconstruction Post-Op

progress_note.txt
PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRESS NOTE

Date: 02/08/2025                    Visit #: 8 of 20
Patient: Maria Garcia               DOB: 05/14/2001 (23 yo)
Diagnosis: S/P Right ACL reconstruction (hamstring autograft)
Surgery Date: 01/10/2025            Surgeon: Dr. Michael Chen, MD
Post-Op Week: 4 weeks

SUBJECTIVE
----------
Patient reports: "My knee is feeling much stronger and I'm walking without crutches now!"

Pain: Reports pain has decreased significantly. Currently 1-2/10 at rest, 3-4/10 with exercise. No night pain. Denies any sharp, catching, or locking sensations.

Swelling: Minimal swelling, "much better than last week." Using ice 2x/day as recommended.

Function: Ambulating independently without assistive device since 2 days ago. Able to perform ADLs without difficulty. Returned to work (office job, sedentary) this week without issues. Performing HEP 2x/day as prescribed. Reports compliance with brace use during ambulation as ordered.

Concerns: Asking about timeline for return to running and soccer (recreational player).

OBJECTIVE
---------
Observation:
- Gait: Normal pattern without assistive device, no antalgic gait
- Effusion: Minimal, stroke test negative today (previously trace positive)
- Surgical incision: Well-healed, no signs of infection, minimal scarring
- Wearing post-op brace unlocked 0-90° per MD protocol

Range of Motion (goniometric):
                Current (2/8)   Previous (2/1)   Goal      Uninvolved
Flexion         118°            105°             135°      142°
Extension       -3°             -5°              0°        0°

Progress: Flexion improved 13° this week, extension improved 2°

Manual Muscle Testing:
                Current   Previous   Uninvolved
Quad (extension) 4-/5     3+/5       5/5
Hamstring        4/5      4-/5       5/5
Hip abductors    4+/5     4/5        5/5
Hip extensors    4+/5     4/5        5/5

Circumference (cm) - 10cm above patella:
Right: 42 cm      Left: 44 cm      Difference: 2 cm (improved from 3 cm last week)

Functional Tests:
- Straight leg raise: Performs without lag, good quad control
- Heel slides: Full active flexion without assistance
- Mini squats (0-45°): 3x15 with good form, symmetrical weight bearing
- Step-ups (4" step): 2x10 each leg, right knee stable, no valgus collapse
- Single leg stance: 30 seconds on right with eyes open (steady)
- Balance (BESS test): 2 errors right leg vs 0 errors left leg

Treatment Provided Today:
- Patellar mobilization (superior/inferior glides)
- Soft tissue mobilization: Quadriceps, hamstrings, iliotibial band
- Therapeutic exercise:
  * Wall slides: 3x15
  * Hamstring curls (5 lbs): 3x12
  * Leg press (30 lbs): 3x10
  * Step-ups progressed to 6" height: 3x10
  * Balance training: Single leg stance on foam
  * Stationary bike: 10 minutes, no resistance (ROM)
- Cryotherapy: 15 minutes post-treatment

Patient Response: Tolerated treatment well. No increase in pain or swelling during or after session. Demonstrating improved quad activation and control.

OBJECTIVE OUTCOME MEASURES:
- IKDC Subjective Knee Form: 64.4 (improved from 52.3 at initial eval)
- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): 56/80 (improved from 42/80)

ASSESSMENT
----------
Patient is a 23-year-old female currently 4 weeks post-op right ACL reconstruction progressing well toward goals. Demonstrates excellent progress this week with significant improvements in ROM, strength, and function.

Impairment Progress:
- ROM: 78% toward goal for flexion, 40% toward goal for extension
- Strength: Quad strength improved from 3+/5 to 4-/5 (60% toward goal)
- Swelling: Minimal effusion, well-controlled with ice and elevation
- Gait: Normalized, no longer requires assistive device

Functional Progress:
- Ambulation: Independent without device (goal met)
- ADLs: Independent without pain (goal met)
- LEFS: Improved 14 points (minimal clinically important difference = 9 points)
- IKDC: Improved 12.1 points (approaching age-matched norms)

Response to Treatment: Excellent. Patient showing appropriate healing timeline consistent with ACL reconstruction protocol. No complications noted. Patient highly compliant with HEP and precautions.

Progress Toward Goals:
1. Full ROM: 78% achieved (on track for 6-week goal)
2. 4+/5 quad strength: 80% achieved (ahead of schedule)
3. Independent ADLs: 100% achieved ✓
4. LEFS >60: 93% achieved (56/60)

Overall Progress: Patient progressing ahead of expected timeline. Meeting post-op week 4 protocol benchmarks. Prognosis remains excellent for full return to sport at 6-9 months.

Barriers: None identified at this time.

PLAN
----
Continue PT 2x/week for 4 weeks, then reassess frequency

Treatment Focus:
1. Continue ROM exercises with goal of full extension by week 6
2. Progressive resistance training for quadriceps and hamstrings
3. Advance balance and proprioception training
4. Initiate light plyometric exercises per MD protocol (week 5+)
5. Continue patellar mobilization and soft tissue techniques
6. Pool therapy to be initiated next week for gait training and resistance exercises

Updated HEP:
- Stationary bike: 15 min daily for ROM
- Heel slides: 3x20 daily
- Quad sets: 3x20 with 5-second holds, daily
- Straight leg raises (4 directions): 2x15 each, daily
- Mini squats: 3x15 daily
- Step-ups (6"): 2x15 each leg, daily
- Balance exercises: Single leg stance 3x30 sec, 2x/day
- Ice after exercises 15-20 minutes

Short-Term Goals (Next 2 weeks):
1. Achieve full knee extension (0°)
2. Improve flexion to 130°
3. Quad strength to 4+/5
4. Progress to bilateral squats (0-90°)
5. Initiate pool-based plyometrics

Long-Term Goals (Continue toward):
1. Full ROM equal to uninvolved side
2. 5/5 strength all lower extremity muscles
3. Return to recreational soccer at 6-9 months post-op per MD clearance
4. IKDC score >85
5. Pass return-to-sport testing battery

Progression Criteria: Will advance to running program when patient demonstrates: full ROM, quad strength ≥80% of uninvolved, no effusion, single leg hop >90% limb symmetry (estimated 12-16 weeks post-op).

Communication: Progress update sent to Dr. Chen. Patient progressing well per protocol.

Next Visit: 02/10/2025 - Continue strengthening progression, initiate pool therapy

___________________________
Physical Therapist Signature
Lic #: PT789012
Date: 02/08/2025

Discharge Summary

Outpatient Orthopedics - Lumbar Strain

discharge_summary.txt
PHYSICAL THERAPY DISCHARGE SUMMARY

Date: 03/15/2025                    Total Visits: 8
Patient: Robert Thompson            DOB: 09/03/1985 (39 yo)
Diagnosis: Lumbar strain, mechanical low back pain
Initial Evaluation: 02/01/2025
Referring Physician: Dr. Patricia Lee, MD

SUMMARY OF CARE
---------------

Initial Presentation (02/01/2025):
Patient presented with acute low back pain following incident at work (lifting heavy box with poor mechanics) 2 weeks prior. Pain rated 6-7/10 at rest, 8-9/10 with forward bending and prolonged sitting. Significant functional limitations with work duties (warehouse supervisor) and ADLs.

Initial Objective Findings:
- ROM: Lumbar flexion 30° (limited by pain), extension 10°, side-bending 15° bilaterally
- Strength: Core musculature 3/5, hip extensors 4-/5 bilaterally
- Straight leg raise: Negative bilaterally
- Neurological exam: Intact
- Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): 52% (severe disability)
- Functional Rating Index (FRI): 68% disability

Treatment Provided:
Frequency: 2x/week for 6 weeks (12 visits total; patient missed 4 appointments)

Interventions:
1. Manual Therapy:
   - Soft tissue mobilization to lumbar paraspinals, quadratus lumborum
   - Joint mobilization: Central PAs to lumbar spine (Grade III-IV)

2. Therapeutic Exercise:
   - Core stabilization progression (dead bug, bird dog, planks)
   - Flexibility program (hip flexors, hamstrings, lumbar spine)
   - Progressive strengthening: Bridges, squats, deadlift mechanics

3. Neuromuscular Re-education:
   - Proper lifting mechanics training
   - Movement pattern correction
   - Ergonomic training for work tasks

4. Modalities: Ice/heat as needed for pain management

5. Patient Education:
   - Pain neuroscience education
   - Activity pacing and body mechanics
   - Self-management strategies

Home Exercise Program:
Patient provided with comprehensive HEP including core strengthening, flexibility exercises, and proper body mechanics. Patient demonstrated independence with program.

DISCHARGE STATUS (03/15/2025)
-----------------------------

Subjective:
Patient reports: "I'm back to work full-time and the back pain is minimal. I feel like I have the tools to manage this myself now."

Pain: 0-1/10 at rest, 2/10 with prolonged activity. No pain with normal work duties or ADLs. Denies any radicular symptoms or neurological changes.

Function: Returned to full duty work 2 weeks ago without restrictions. Performing all ADLs without limitations. Exercising independently 4-5x/week. Successfully applied proper lifting mechanics during work tasks.

Objective Findings at Discharge:
Range of Motion (goniometric):
             Discharge    Initial    Normal
Flexion      88°          30°        90°
Extension    28°          10°        30°
Side-bend R  30°          15°        30°
Side-bend L  30°          15°        30°

Strength (MMT):
             Discharge    Initial
Core         5/5          3/5
Hip flexors  5/5          4/5
Hip extensors 5/5         4-/5
QL bilaterally 5/5        3+/5

Functional Tests:
- Trunk stability: Plank hold 90 seconds (initially 20 seconds)
- Sit-to-stand: 20 repetitions in 30 seconds with good form
- Proper squat mechanics: 25 repetitions with 20 lbs, neutral spine maintained
- Lifting simulation (proper deadlift): 40 lbs with excellent form

Outcome Measures:
                         Discharge    Initial     Change    MCID*
Oswestry Disability Index  8%          52%        -44%      10%
Functional Rating Index    12%         68%        -56%      9 points
Numeric Pain Rating        1/10        7/10       -6
Global Rating of Change    +6 (good deal better)

*MCID = Minimal Clinically Important Difference (threshold for meaningful change)

GOALS STATUS
------------

Short-Term Goals (all goals MET):
✓ Decrease pain to 3/10 or less with ADLs
✓ Increase lumbar flexion ROM to 70°
✓ Improve core strength to 4+/5
✓ Independent with HEP
✓ Return to work with modified duty

Long-Term Goals (all goals MET):
✓ Pain 0-2/10 with all activities including work
✓ Restore full lumbar ROM (within normal limits)
✓ Core strength 5/5
✓ Return to full duty work without restrictions
✓ ODI score <20% (minimal disability)
✓ Independent with self-management program

DISCHARGE ASSESSMENT
--------------------

Patient successfully achieved all therapy goals and demonstrated excellent progress over 8 treatment sessions. ROM improved to within normal limits, strength normalized, and pain decreased from severe (7/10) to minimal (1/10). Functional outcome measures showed clinically significant improvements exceeding minimal important differences.

Patient demonstrated excellent adherence to HEP and successfully applied body mechanics training to work environment. Patient is independent with self-management strategies including appropriate exercise progression, pain management techniques, and activity modification as needed.

No remaining barriers to function. Patient returns to prior level of function at work and home. Patient educated on signs/symptoms requiring return to PT or MD evaluation (radicular symptoms, progressive weakness, loss of bowel/bladder control).

Functional Status: Patient has returned to full duty work as warehouse supervisor performing all lifting, bending, and physical demands without restrictions. All ADLs performed independently without pain or limitation.

Prognosis for Long-Term Outcome: Excellent. Patient has demonstrated ability to self-manage condition and possesses knowledge and skills to prevent recurrence.

DISCHARGE PLAN
--------------

Recommendations:
1. Continue independent HEP 3-4x/week for maintenance
2. Continue to apply proper body mechanics with all lifting tasks
3. Maintain physical activity and general fitness
4. Self-manage any minor flare-ups with ice/heat, modified activity, and HEP

Follow-Up: Patient discharged from PT at this time. Patient instructed to contact PT or MD if symptoms worsen or new symptoms develop.

Return to PT: Patient may return to PT if needed in the future. No current barriers to discharge from skilled PT services.

Patient Education Provided:
- Comprehensive HEP with written instructions and photos
- Red flags requiring medical attention
- Self-management strategies for minor symptom flare-ups
- Long-term prevention strategies
- Body mechanics guide specific to work tasks

Patient Verbalized Understanding: Patient demonstrated excellent understanding of discharge plan, HEP, and self-management strategies. Patient expressed confidence in ability to manage independently.

Reason for Discharge: Patient achieved all therapy goals. No longer requires skilled physical therapy intervention. Patient independent with self-management program.

___________________________
Physical Therapist Signature
Lic #: PT345678
Date: 03/15/2025

PT Measurements & Terminology

Proper measurement and documentation techniques are essential for demonstrating objective progress and justifying skilled services.

Range of Motion (ROM)

Goniometric measurements in degrees

Measurement Methods:

Goniometry:Standard measurement tool for joint angles
Visual estimation:Quick screening (less accurate, not billable)
Inclinometry:Digital measurement, especially for spine

Documentation Best Practices:

  • Always measure and document bilaterally for comparison
  • Note if active (AROM) or passive (PROM) motion
  • Document end-feel (normal, hard, soft, empty)
  • Record pain during motion and at what degree
  • Compare to normative values and uninvolved side

Muscle Strength (MMT)

Manual Muscle Testing grading scale

MMT Grading Scale:

5/5NormalFull ROM against gravity with maximal resistance
4/5GoodFull ROM against gravity with moderate resistance
3/5FairFull ROM against gravity, no resistance
2/5PoorFull ROM with gravity eliminated
1/5TraceVisible or palpable contraction, no joint motion
0/5ZeroNo visible or palpable contraction

Plus/Minus Notation:

+: Stronger than grade but not next level (e.g., 4+/5)

-: Weaker than grade but not previous level (e.g., 4-/5)

Pain Scales

Standardized pain measurement tools

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)0-10, most common in PT

Quick, validated, widely understood

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)0-100mm line

More sensitive to change than NRS

Body DiagramMark location and severity

Captures pain distribution and patterns

McGill Pain QuestionnaireQualitative descriptors

Comprehensive pain characterization

Document pain at rest, with activity, and best/worst in 24 hours. Use OPQRST format.

Functional Outcome Measures

Standardized questionnaires and performance tests

Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)0-80, higher = better
Any lower extremity conditionMCID: 9 points
Quick DASH0-100, lower = better
Upper extremity disabilityMCID: 10 points
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)0-100%, lower = better
Low back pain disabilityMCID: 10%
Neck Disability Index (NDI)0-50, lower = better
Neck pain disabilityMCID: 5 points
FOTO (Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes)Risk-adjusted
Multiple body regions, required by some payersMCID: Varies by measure
Patient-Specific Functional Scale0-10 per activity
Patient-chosen functional tasksMCID: 2 points
Timed Up and Go (TUG)Seconds
Mobility and fall riskMCID: 1.4 sec for community dwelling
IKDC (Knee)0-100, higher = better
Knee injuries and surgeriesMCID: 9-16 points

Medicare Documentation Requirements

Medicare has specific documentation standards that physical therapists must meet to ensure reimbursement and avoid audits. Understanding these requirements is critical for practice success.

Medical Necessity

Document why skilled PT services are required

Must Include:

  • Complexity requiring clinical judgment of a PT
  • Skilled techniques not taught to patient/caregiver
  • Need for ongoing assessment and modification
  • Risk factors requiring skilled supervision

Example:

Patient requires skilled manual therapy for joint mobilization and skilled exercise prescription with progressive modification based on patient response. Home exercise program alone insufficient due to need for hands-on techniques and ongoing assessment of healing post-operatively.

Certifications and Recertifications

Initial certification at SOC, recertify every 90 days

Must Include:

  • Start of care (initial evaluation) certification
  • Recertification at 90 days if continuing
  • Physician signature on plan of care
  • Update to show continued need for skilled services

Example:

Plan of care certified by Dr. Smith on 02/15/2025 for frequency of 2x/week for 8 weeks. Recertification required by 05/15/2025 if patient not discharged.

Progress Documentation

Document objective progress toward functional goals

Must Include:

  • Comparison to previous measurements
  • Percentage toward goal achievement
  • Functional improvements (not just impairment changes)
  • Response to treatment interventions
  • Updated prognosis and timeframe

Example:

ROM flexion improved from 105° to 118° (87% toward goal of 135°). LEFS score improved from 42/80 to 56/80, exceeding MCID of 9 points. Patient now independent with ADLs (goal met). Prognosis remains good for return to sport at 6 months.

Skilled Language

Use language that demonstrates skilled services

Avoid:

  • Maintenance therapy
  • General fitness/conditioning
  • Routine or repetitive treatment
  • Activities patient could do independently

Use Skilled Language:

  • Progressive therapeutic exercise with skilled modification
  • Neuromuscular re-education requiring clinical judgment
  • Manual therapy techniques requiring skilled hands-on treatment
  • Gait training with skilled assessment and cueing

Example:

Discharge Planning

Document discharge planning throughout episode of care

Must Include:

  • Target discharge date or visit count
  • Discharge criteria
  • Progress toward independent self-management
  • Plan for long-term maintenance

Example:

Patient expected to discharge in 3-4 weeks upon achieving full ROM and independent HEP. Currently 75% toward discharge criteria. Discharge planning includes advanced HEP, return to sport progression, and self-management strategies.

Common Audit Triggers

Medicare audits often focus on these documentation issues:

  • Lack of medical necessity or skilled service justification
  • Missing physician certification or signature
  • No objective progress documented over time
  • Maintenance therapy without documented change in functional status
  • Duplicate or copy-paste notes without individualized content

Common PT Documentation Mistakes

These frequent errors can lead to denied claims, audit failures, and legal liability. Learn what to avoid and how to document correctly.

Using vague, non-measurable language

Avoid:

Patient's shoulder is getting better. ROM improving.

Better:

Shoulder flexion ROM increased from 142° to 165° (23° improvement). Pain decreased from 7/10 to 3/10 with overhead reaching.

Why it matters: Medicare and insurance require objective, measurable data to justify continued skilled services and demonstrate medical necessity.

Not documenting functional outcomes

Avoid:

Strength increased to 4/5. Patient able to lift 10 lbs.

Better:

Quadriceps strength increased from 3+/5 to 4/5. Patient now able to ascend stairs step-over-step without pain (previously step-to pattern). LEFS score improved from 42 to 56 (exceeds MCID).

Why it matters: Functional outcomes demonstrate real-world impact and medical necessity. Impairment measures alone don't justify skilled services.

Copying previous notes without updates

Avoid:

Same HEP as last visit. Continue current treatment plan.

Better:

HEP progressed today: Increased resistance band from red to green for external rotation exercises (2x15). Added step-downs to HEP now that patient demonstrates eccentric quad control. Patient independent with new exercises.

Why it matters: Documentation must show skilled progression. Copy-paste suggests maintenance therapy not requiring skilled services.

Failing to justify continued skilled services

Avoid:

Continue current POC. Patient making progress.

Better:

Patient requires continued skilled PT for progressive joint mobilization techniques (Grade IV), which cannot be self-administered, and skilled modification of exercise program based on tissue healing and patient response. Exercise progression requires ongoing clinical judgment due to post-surgical precautions.

Why it matters: Must clearly articulate why PT intervention is necessary and cannot be done independently or by non-skilled personnel.

Not documenting response to treatment

Avoid:

Performed joint mobilization and therapeutic exercises.

Better:

Grade III posterior glide glenohumeral joint performed x3 minutes. Immediate reassessment showed ER ROM increased from 52° to 60° (8° improvement). Patient tolerated well with no increase in pain. Will continue this intervention next session.

Why it matters: Response to treatment justifies intervention choice and demonstrates skilled assessment informing clinical decisions.

Missing bilateral comparisons

Avoid:

Right knee flexion 115°.

Better:

Right knee flexion 115° (left knee 140°). Deficit of 25° compared to uninvolved side. Normal values 130-145°.

Why it matters: Bilateral comparison provides context for deficits and demonstrates medical necessity. Comparing to uninvolved side and norms is standard of care.

Inadequate initial evaluation

Avoid:

Patient has knee pain. ROM limited. Will work on strengthening.

Better:

Patient presents with anterior knee pain, insidious onset 6 weeks ago. Goniometric ROM: flexion 118° (N=135°), extension -5° (N=0°). MMT: quads 3+/5, hamstrings 4/5. Patellar mobility restricted medially. + patellar compression test. LEFS 42/80. Diagnosis: Patellofemoral pain syndrome with quad weakness and patellar hypomobility.

Why it matters: Initial evaluation must comprehensively document baseline to justify skilled services and establish medical necessity. Detailed assessment supports differential diagnosis.

Not using standardized outcome measures

Avoid:

Patient says shoulder is much better.

Better:

DASH score improved from 52 to 28 (24-point improvement, exceeds MCID of 10). Patient reports "shoulder is much better." Objective improvement demonstrated in functional questionnaire.

Why it matters: Standardized outcome measures provide validated, objective evidence of progress. Required by many payers and quality reporting programs.

Physical Therapy Note Template

Use this comprehensive SOAP template for initial evaluations and progress notes. Customize based on your setting and patient population.

pt_soap_note_template.txt
PHYSICAL THERAPY SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE
===================================

Date: [Date]                Time: [Time]
Patient: [Name]             DOB: [DOB] ([Age] yo)
Diagnosis: [ICD-10 codes and diagnoses]
Physician: [MD name]        Rx Date: [Date]
Visit #: [X of Y authorized]

SUBJECTIVE
----------
Chief Complaint: "[Patient's words]"

Pain Assessment:
- Location:
- Quality: (sharp, dull, aching, burning, stabbing)
- Intensity: __/10 at rest, __/10 with activity
- Aggravating factors:
- Alleviating factors:
- 24-hour pattern:

Functional Limitations:
- Work:
- ADLs:
- Recreation:
- Sleep:

Patient Goals:
1.
2.
3.

Prior Treatment:

Medical History:

Medications:

OBJECTIVE
---------
Observation:
- Posture:
- Gait:
- Assistive devices:
- Edema/swelling:

Palpation:
- Tenderness:
- Muscle tone:
- Temperature:

Range of Motion (goniometric, degrees):
              Active    Passive   WNL    Uninvolved
Motion 1:     ___°      ___°      ___°   ___°
Motion 2:     ___°      ___°      ___°   ___°

Manual Muscle Testing (0-5 scale):
              Right     Left
Muscle 1:     __/5      __/5
Muscle 2:     __/5      __/5

Special Tests:
- Test 1: [Positive/Negative]
- Test 2: [Positive/Negative]

Neurological Screening:
- Sensation:
- Reflexes:
- Coordination:

Functional Tests:
- Test 1:
- Test 2:

Outcome Measures:
- [LEFS/DASH/ODI/etc]: ____ (Date: ____)

Treatment Provided:
1.
2.
3.

Patient Response:

ASSESSMENT
----------
PT Diagnosis:

Impairments (Body Structure/Function):
-
-

Activity Limitations:
-
-

Participation Restrictions:
-
-

Progress Toward Goals:
1. Goal 1: ___% achieved
2. Goal 2: ___% achieved

Response to Treatment:

Prognosis:

Rehabilitation Potential:

Medical Necessity Justification:

PLAN
----
Frequency/Duration: __x/week for __ weeks (__visits total)

Interventions:
1. Manual therapy:
2. Therapeutic exercise:
3. Neuromuscular re-education:
4. Modalities:
5. Patient education:

Home Exercise Program:
-
-

Short-Term Goals (__ weeks):
1.
2.
3.

Long-Term Goals (__ weeks):
1.
2.
3.

Progression Plan:

Next Visit:

Medical Necessity:


_______________________________
Physical Therapist Signature
License #: PT______
Date: ___________

Save Hours on PT Documentation with AI

PatientNotes uses AI to help physical therapists document faster while maintaining Medicare compliance and APTA standards. Generate comprehensive SOAP notes from dictation or templates in seconds.

Try PatientNotes Free

Frequently Asked Questions

What should be included in a physical therapy SOAP note?

A PT SOAP note should include: Subjective (patient-reported pain, functional limitations, goals), Objective (ROM measurements, strength testing, special tests, functional assessments, standardized outcome measures), Assessment (PT diagnosis, progress toward goals, response to treatment, prognosis), and Plan (frequency/duration, specific interventions, exercise prescription, progression criteria, and discharge planning).

How do you document range of motion in physical therapy?

ROM should be documented using goniometric measurements in degrees. Include: the specific joint and motion, numerical measurement, whether active or passive, comparison to uninvolved side, comparison to normative values, end-feel quality, and any pain during motion. Example: "Right shoulder flexion: 142° AROM (left 175°, normal 180°), firm end-feel, pain 6/10 at end range."

What are the Medicare documentation requirements for physical therapy?

Medicare requires: certification/recertification of plan of care every 90 days with physician signature, documentation of medical necessity (why skilled PT is required), objective measurable progress toward functional goals, skilled language demonstrating clinical judgment, standardized outcome measures, and clear discharge planning. Progress notes must show comparison to baseline and percentage toward goals.

How often should physical therapists write progress notes?

Progress note frequency depends on payer requirements and clinical changes. Medicare requires documentation at minimum every 10 treatment days. Many facilities require weekly progress notes. Always document when there is significant change in patient status, major progression/regression, or at certification/recertification periods. Daily visit notes should capture treatment provided and response.

What functional outcome measures should PT use?

Common standardized outcome measures include: Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for lower extremity conditions, Quick DASH for upper extremity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low back pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI) for neck pain, Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) for any condition, and condition-specific measures like IKDC for knee injuries. FOTO may be required by some payers. Select measures validated for the specific condition and track throughout episode of care.

How do you document skilled services in physical therapy?

Use skilled language emphasizing clinical judgment: "progressive therapeutic exercise with skilled modification based on patient response," "manual therapy techniques requiring specialized training," "neuromuscular re-education with skilled cueing," "gait training with skilled assessment." Avoid maintenance language like "routine exercises" or "continued same program." Document why the service requires PT expertise and cannot be done independently or by non-skilled personnel.

What is the difference between PT initial evaluation and progress notes?

Initial evaluations are comprehensive baseline assessments including full history, detailed examination, diagnosis, prognosis, and complete plan of care with goals. They establish medical necessity and justify frequency/duration. Progress notes are briefer, focused updates documenting changes since previous note, response to treatment, progress toward goals (with percentages), and plan updates. Progress notes demonstrate ongoing medical necessity for skilled services.

How should physical therapists document pain in SOAP notes?

Document pain comprehensively using: numeric rating scale (0-10), location with body diagram if needed, quality (sharp, dull, aching, burning), timing (constant vs intermittent, 24-hour pattern), aggravating factors, alleviating factors, and functional impact. Use the OPQRST method: Onset, Provocation, Quality, Region/Radiation, Severity, Timing. Compare pain levels at rest vs with activity. Track changes from visit to visit.

Spend More Time with Patients, Less on Documentation

PatientNotes uses AI to help physical therapists create comprehensive, Medicare-compliant SOAP notes in minutes. Reduce documentation time by up to 50%.

No credit card required. HIPAA compliant. APTA member approved.